Developing A Multi-Directional Single-Leg Jumping Assessment which Incorporates Technical, Physical and Perceptual Components of Performance

Review Article

Developing A Multi-Directional Single-Leg Jumping Assessment which Incorporates Technical, Physical and Perceptual Components of Performance

Corresponding author: Dmitry Verniba, Orthopaedic Neuromechanics Laboratory, 2020 Sherman Health Science Research Centre, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M3J 1P3, Tel: +1(416)736-2100
ext 22042; Fax: +1(416)736-5772;Email:


Developing a comprehensive athlete profile can provide coaches and clinicians with a variety of valuable information regarding individual players’ performance and capabilities. Creating an assessment that is not only reliable, but also addresses the three primary components of agility (technical, physical and perceptual) is needed to better assess individual player strengths and weaknesses. Unilateral performance measures across multiple directions can be used to detect directional-specific asymmetries which may provide valuable information regarding those players that are at an increased risk of injury or that may not be ready to return to play following a lower limb injury. A percent difference in performance measures between legs that exceeds 15% in any of the three directions is thought to place the athlete at greater risk of injury. Additional characteristics associated with alignment, muscle activation patterns and relative joint angles throughout the movement can also be indicative of high risk movement patterns. Further research is needed to assess the reliability and develop normative data for such an assessment.

Keywords: Leg Power; Lower Limb Injury; Asymmetry; Single-Leg Jumping; Agility

Abbreviations: ASI- Average Symmetry Index


Identifying strengths and weaknesses within individual players’ performances often provides valuable information for coaches and clinicians. As such, a variety of different functional performance tests are often used as diagnostic tools when determining a player’s 1) player potential; 2) potential for injury; 3) strength and conditioning programming; 4) injury prevention programming; and 5) gathering baseline data for progress assessments and 6) assessing readiness to return to play following an injury. As many movements performed in sport reflect the agility of the athlete (e.g., responding to opponents movements, accelerating and decelerating efficiently, maintaining balance and control throughout the competition, etc.). Agility can be defined as a rapid whole-body movement requiring changes in velocity and/or direction in response to a sport-specific stimulus [1-3]. From this working definition, it is clear that there are technical, physical and perceptual components involved. However, many tests of agility and sports performance do not measure all three components (with most eliminating the reactive element). Creating a comprehensive player profile requires not only performance measures pertinent to the sport and tasks regularly performed, but must also include aspects of decision-making, technique proficiency, physical strengths and anthropometric characteristics(see Figure 1).

Figure 1. Deterministic model of agility (modified from [4])

Of interest in this article is the development of a single-legjumping assessment across multiple directions that is able to detect differences in performance through a variety of technical, physical and reactive elements. When these variablesare excessively high or differ substantially between limbs, theathlete is considered to be at an increased risk of lower limbinjury [5-16]. Therefore, an easily administered and reliable assessment that is able to identify such characteristics whenperforming sport-specific tasks would seem to be of great value to coaches and clinicians.

Multi-directional Performance

A common measure of leg strength and power in sport is thevertical jump assessment. This is primarily due to its relativelysimple testing procedures and high reliability of performance results [17]. However, in sport, a player’s movements are notconfined to a single direction (e.g. vertical) but are performed across multiple directions throughout the entirety of the competition.Additionally, it has been shown in recent researchthat a player’s leg strength capabilities are not uniform across these various directions [8,17-19]. Therefore, using only themaximum vertical jump assessment as a means of developing a player profile for those athletes that perform multi-directional movements (vertical, horizontal and lateral) in their sport creates an inaccurate representation of the player’s strengthand power capabilities [18]. An assessment of leg power that can be performed across multiple directions can provide coachesand clinicians with valuable information regarding baseline values, minimum standard values (e.g. performance indicators),and a means of monitoring player progress (whether injured or not) [17]. Additionally, shared variances (rangingfrom 13 – 62%) reported in 3 separate studies [18,20,21] investigating multi-directional jumping have indicated that eachdirection measures relatively independent leg qualities of each other; further supporting the inclusion of horizontal and lateralhopping into the standard vertical jump assessment.

Unilateral Performance

Dynamic movements in sport are not always performed onboth legs simultaneously (i.e. bilaterally). Players are oftenrequired to jump, land, change direction, accelerate, etc. using only one leg at a time (i.e. unilaterally). As such, the legs maydiffer substantially in strength, power and technical characteristics.When a single leg is used to generate or absorb large ground reaction forces (characterized in particular by jumptake-off and landing, respectively), any muscular imbalances will increase the strain placed on the single leg and may detrimentallyaffect the performance [5,7,17,22]. By isolating one leg at a time during the movement task, a measure of symmetry(ASI = average symmetry index) between limbs can easily be calculated using the following equation [17].

ASI = [1 – (dominant limb/non-dominant limb)] x 100
ASI = [1 – un-injured limb/injured limb)] x 100

It is important to note that some researchers use the absolutevalue of the ASI measure which masks valuable informationregarding which leg is actually performing better. By eliminating the absolute value component of the equation (as shownabove), a positive ASI value will be representative of the dominant/ un-injured limb having superior strength while a negative ASI value will indicate that the non-dominant/injuredlimb had superior strength and power [17].

When an ASI is calculated for a given movement performance,the magnitude of the imbalance can be an indicator of an increased potential for injury. This is of particular interest whenclearing a player to return to their respective sport followingan injury. There is no solid threshold of ASI magnitude thatseparates injured players from non-injured; however a magnitude that exceeds 15% is often associated with players whohave recently sustained an injury to their lower limb, while normative data for various un-injured populations of athletestend to present ASI values below 10% [5,6,8-14]. Therefore, the grading scale outlined in Table 1 can be used as a generalguide for determining the severity of an ASI magnitude. It is important to note, however, that these classifications are notan absolute. For example, an athlete presenting an ASI measure of 17 in one direction may not necessarily incur a lowerlimb injury, while a player presenting an ASI measure of 6 in one direction may. This scale is designed to identify those playersthat are at a greater risk of injury due to their increased imbalances between limbs in one or more movement directions.Insert Table 1 here.

Table 1. Classification of average symmetry index (ASI) thresholds.

Multi-directional Unilateral Assessment

Performing a single-leg countermovement jump into the vertical,horizontal and lateral directions can provide highly reliabledata (ICCs ranging from 0.82-0.96, CV% < 7.2 [9,21,22]) and a more comprehensive profile regarding a player’s legstrength and power output. Additionally, depending on the resources available, such a comprehensive assessment canreflect more sensitive measures of force and power (derived from force plate analysis) or less sensitive measures of jump distance/height (via manual measurement or video analysis). Regardless of the resources available, the single-leg countermovementassessment will provide valuable feedback on thecurrent status of each individual player with relatively high reliability.

Technical Performance Indicators

The strategies used to successfully complete a given task willoften vary across players and genders. There are, however, various body positions and techniques that are thought to be associatedwith an increased incidence of injury to the lower extremities (see Table 2). A kinematic analysis of the movementpatterns used when performing the multi-directional leg assessment may provide further insight into specific movementpatterns that predispose an athlete to injury or a subsequent injury following recovery and medical clearance.

Table 2. Characteristics of movement performances identified as possiblemechanisms for lower extremity injury.

A 3-D video analysis of the multi-directional single-leg assessmentshould be used in order to analyze the movementpatterns being performed. When comparing previously injured athletes to un-injured athletes, those athletes that havemore recently sustained a lower limb injury will likely present additional altered techniques to compensate for the lackof strength, coordination and confidence in the injured limb [14]. As that limb becomes stronger, those previously identifiedcharacteristics will likely dissipate. However, if they fail to diminish over time, the athlete will be at an even greater riskfor injury (in either limb).

Decision-making Element

Creating a comprehensive player profile must take into accountas many components of agility as possible. However,many assessments of this nature do not measure all three components. Therefore, to create a complete profile of the athlete’sabilities, it is important to include a sport-specific reactive element to the assessment. In the multi-directional single-legjumping assessment that this paper has been centered around, a reactive element can easily be included by having the athlete react to a signal (auditory or visual) by jumping into the designateddirection. Another option is to have the athlete perform multiple jumps into one direction, stopping immediately on the researcher’s command. This would provide additionalinformation concerning balance and control as well as time to stabilization (a factor identified in Table 2).


Player’s movements in sport are not confined to only one directionand are commonly performed off of a single leg. To create a complete profile of athletes’ performance proficiencies, areliable assessment is needed that incorporates not only single- leg multi-directional movements, but also kinematic analysisof movement techniques as well as a reactive component. Highly valuable information gathered from such a comprehensiveassessment includes: direction-specific performances, asymmetry magnitudes, alignments upon landing, contacttime (if consecutive jumps are performed), time to stabilization, muscle activation patterns, and reaction time/accuracy.Reliability of such an assessment is needed, as well as normative measures for both genders and across various sports andperformance levels.



1.Gabbett T and Benton D. Reactive agility of rugby league players. J Sci Med Sport. 2009, 12(1): 212-214.

2.Markovic G. Poor relationship between strength and power qualities and agility performance. J Sports Med Phys Fit. 2007, 47(3): 276-83.

3.Sheppard J and Young W. An evaluation of a new test of reactive agility and its relationship to sprint speed and change of direction speed. J Sci Med Sport 2006, 9: 342-349.

4.Hewit J, Cronin J, and Hume P. Understanding change of direction performance: A technical analysis of a 180⁰ groundbased turn and sprint task. Int J Sport Sci Coaching. 2012, 7(3): 493-501.

5.Hewit J, Cronin J, and Hume P. Asymmetry in multi-directional jumping tasks. Phys Ther Sport. 2012, 13:238-242.

6.Hickey K, Quatman C, Myer G, Ford K, Brosky J and Hewett T. Methodological report: Dynamic field tests used in an NFL combine setting to identify lower extremity functional asymmetries. J Strength Cond Res. 2009, 23: 2500-2506.

7.Hoffman J, Ratamess N, Klatt M, Faigenbaum A and Kang J. Do bilateral power deficits influence direction-specific movement patterns? Res Sports Med. 2007, 15: 125-132.

8.Maulder P and Conin J. Horizontal and vertical jump assessment: Reliability, symmetry, discriminative and predictive ability. Phys Ther Sport. 2005, 6: 74-82.

9.McElveen M, Riemann B, and Davies G. Bilateral comparison of propulsion mechanics during single-leg vertical jumping. J Strength Cond Res. 2010, 24(2): 375-382.

10.Meylan C, Nosaka K, Green J, and Cronin J. Temporal and kinetic analysis of unilateral jumping in the vertical, horizontal and lateral directions. J Sports Sci. 2010, 28: 545-554.

11.Newton R, Gerber A, Nimphius S, Shim J, Doan B et al. Determination of functional strength imbalance of the lower extremities. J Strength Cond Res. 2006, 20: 971-977.

12.Noyes F, Barber S and Mangine R. Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by functional hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J of Sports Med. 1991, 19(5): 513-518.

13.Pappas E, Hagins M, Sheikhzadeh A, Nordin M, Rose D. Biomechanical differences between unilateral and bilateral landings from a jump: Gender differences. Clin J Sports Med. 2007, 17:263-268.

14.Paterno M, Ford K, Myer G, Heyl R, and Hewett T. Limb asymmetries in landing and jumping 2 years following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin J Sports Med. 2007, 17: 258-262.

15.Ross S, Guskiewicz K, Yu B. Single-leg jumping-landing stabilization times in subjects with functionally unstable ankles. J Athl Tr. 2005, 40(4): 298-304.

16.Wickstrom E, Tillman M, Kline K, Borsa P. Gender and limb differences in dynamic postural stability during landing. Clin J Sports Med. 2006, 16:311-31

17.Hewit J, Cronin J, and Hume P. Multidirectional leg asymmetry assessment in sport. Str Cond J. 2012, 34(1): 82-86.

18.Cronin J and Hansen K. Strength and Power predictors of sports speed. J Strength Cond Res 2005, 19: 349-357.

19.Meylan C, McMaster T, Cronin J, Mohammad N, Rogers C et al. Single-leg lateral, horizontal, and vertical jump assessment: Reliability, interrelationships, and ability to predict sprint change-of-direction performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2009, 23: 1140-1147.

20.Greenberger H and Paterno M. The test-retest reliability of a one-legged hop for distance in healthy young adults. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994, 19: 62.

21.Markovic G, Dizdar D, Jukic I, and Cardinale M. Reliability and factorial validity of squat and countermovement jump tests. J Strength Cond Res. 2004, 18: 551-555.

22.Coventry E, O’Connor K, Hart B, Earl J, Ebersole K. The effect of lower extremity fatigue on shock attenuation during single-leg landing. Clin Biomech. 2006, 21:1090-1097.

23.Chaudhari A, Hearn B, Andriacchi A. Sport-dependent variations in arm position during single-limb landing influences knee loading: Implications for anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med. 2005, 33:824-830.

24.Colby S, Francisco A, Yu B, Kirkendall D, Finch M, Garrett Jr W. Electromyographic and kinematic analysis of cutting maneuvers: Implications for anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med. 2000, 28:234-240.

25.Ireland M. Anterior cruciate ligament injury in female athletes: epidemiology. J Athl Tr. 1999, 34(2):150-154.

26.Myer G, Brent J, Ford K, Hewett T. Real-time assessment and neuromuscular training feedback techniques to prevent ACL injury in female athletes. Str Cond J. 2011, 33(3):21-35.

27.Myer G, Ford K, Brent J, Hewett T. An integrated approach to change the outcome Part I: Neuromuscular screening methods to identify high ACL injury risk athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2012, 26(8): 2265-2271.

28.Swartz E, Decoster L, Russell P, Croce R. Effects of developmental stage and sex on lower extremity kinematics and vertical ground reaction forces during landing. J Athl Tr. 2005, 40(1): 9-14.

Be the first to comment on "Developing A Multi-Directional Single-Leg Jumping Assessment which Incorporates Technical, Physical and Perceptual Components of Performance"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.