Oral Malodor as a Health and Social Problem

Review article 

Oral Malodor as a Health and Social Problem

Corresponding author: Dr. Najwa Nassrawin, P.O Box 1438 Al Jubieha, Amman 11941 Jordan,
Tel: 00962795041388; Email: najwanass@yahoo.com
Abstract

Oral malodor is a serious problem that makes subjects who suffer from it subjected to adverse health and embarrassing consequences. Oral malodor may lead to significant personal discomfort and social embarrassment. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of this condition including: oral malodor examination protocol, causes, prevalence, methods of diagnosis and proposed treatment options.

Material and Methods

A midline search was conducted on many articles that discuss oral malodor.

Conclusion

The current review revealed the importance of the proper diagnosis and so the appropriate therapy could be achieved.

Keywords: Oral Malodor; Causes; Diagnosis and Treatment.

Introduction

Oral malodor (OM) describes an unpleasant or offensive odor emanating from the oral cavity [1]. Individuals who suffer from this condition often are subjected to adverse health and embarrassing social consequences as well as impediments to interpersonal relationships and life style [2]. Current research recognizes the complex and challenging spectrum of both medical and psychological issues related to treatment of chronic oral malodor.

Objectionable odor emanating from the mouth mainly is based on hydrogen sulfide, methyl mercaptan, and dimethyl sulfide [3]. These are produced by the interaction of Gram-negative bacteria and food debris, cells, saliva, and blood within the oral cavity, resulting in the decarboxylation of cysteine, cystine, and methionine [4-7].

Prevalence of Oral Malodor

Although studies on the prevalence of chronic OM have become more frequent in the last 20 years, the different criteria and methods of diagnosis lead to significant apparent variations in the prevalence of this condition among different populations. Currently, there are no universally accepted standard criteria defining OM [8,9]. Differences in how chronic OM is perceived also vary among culturally-diverse populations (Table 1).

However; persistent OM statistically is prevalent among people more than 20-years-old [20]. Although there is no difference in relation to gender [18,20,21], the level of volatile sulfide compounds (VSCs) in mouth air is significantly lower in 78% of males experiencing bad breath after waking up versus that in females [14,19]. Also it has been reported some changes in the level of volatile sulfur compounds during pregnancy and menstrual cycle especially if the women has periodontitis [22].

Table 1. Prevalence of OM by Country.


Types of Oral Malodor

Oral malodor can be classified into three groups:

-Genuine halitosis which can be either physiologic halitosis (e.g morning halitosis) or fasting breath that is transient and self-limited, its common complaint. Estimates show perhaps one quarter of all adults suffer from malodor [23].

-Pathologic one that is due to pathological condition rather than a lack of consistent oral hygiene, which may be from oral origin like gingivitis, periodontitis, tongue coating (posterior dorsum of the tongue). Tongue surface is composed of blood components, nutrients, large amount of desquamated epithelial cells, studies indicates that the bacteria residing on the tongue make the dominant contribution to oral malodor [24,25] or decrease amount of saliva in case of xerostomia [26]. In addition it has been found that the increase in saliva viscosity increase the risk of having oral malodor [27]. Also oral related e.g tonsillitis, sinusitis and rhinitis, and it could be from exra-oral origin like gastrointestinal problems. It is reported that 87% of OM originates from oral sources [28].

In addition it has been found that the increase in saliva viscosity increase the risk of having oral malodor [27].

-Pseudo-halitosis: complains of oral malodor without the actual existence.

-Halitophobia: where there is fear of halitosis in the absence of objective oral malodor. . It may occurs as a symptoms in various psychologic disorder. It may also associated with anxiety [29].

Methods of OM Diagnosis

Self estimation can be used to judge one’s own oral malodor [25]. but in case dental consultation dentist consultation, bad breath easily can be determined by either organoleptic or physio-chemical methods.

Organoleptic Method

This method of assessment can be performed by general dental practitioner, dental hygienist or general practitioner. The examiner uses the sense of smell to detect the patient’s oral odor, and ranks the intensity of the odor. A scoring system  designed for this method is based on estimating the intensity of the exhaled odor on a scale of 0-to-5 points [20](Table 2). In order to better consider the overall results, patients and examiners follow the same instructions, such as the avoidance of coffee, tea, juice, smoking, and scented cosmetics. In addition, patients must stop using mouthwashes, breath fresher, and abstain from smoking for 12 hours before each assessment. Organoleptic scoring, however, is considered an uncomfortable procedure for testing OM for both the examiner and patient [30].

Table 2. Organoleptic scores.

Volatile Sulfur Compounds Measurement/Gas Chromatography

This laboratory-based procedure utilizes a flame photometer detector to reveal volatile sulfur compounds, primarily hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and methyl mercaptan (CH3SH), by analyzing the sulfur content of the subject’s mouth air [31]. Although the results are precise and reliable but it takes long time to run, moreover; it is expensive and requires a skilled operator [32]. A sulfide monitor, developed in the 1990s, is convenient for use in the dental office. Unfortunately, this test underperforms in terms of detecting methyl mercaptan, a significant component of OM-related to periodontal disease [33].

Other sensors of volatile sulfur compounds, linked directly to the periodontal probes of specific areas, produce readings that compare significantly to the results produced by the organoleptic method [34]. Some of these techniques can be used to quantify and monitor changes of chronic OM [32].

Breathron

Breathtron, a semiconductor of volatile sulfur compound (VSC) sensors, is a ZnO thick film filter lining a disposable mouthpiece [34]. This monitor digitally detects VSCs in the mouth. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, subjects with VSC levels below 250ppb are classified as normal odor patients whereas those with levels above this threshold are classified as malodor patients [35,36].

Benzoyl-DLarginine-naphthylamide (BANA) Test

The BANA test is based on incubating samples wiped from the tongue with a cotton swab. It is test strip which composed of benzoyl-DLarginine-naphthylamide acting as a synthetic trypsin substrate [20]. This test is capable of determining the proteolytic activity of anaerobic organisms in the oral cavity  uch as P gingivalis, T denticola, and B. forsythus. If organisms have enzymes that degrade BANA, colored compounds that are either light or dark blue are produced within 5-to-15 minutes. The darker the color the higher the concentration and the greater the number of organisms [37] . There is a significant relationship between organoleptic and Halimeter measurements. Comparison of these methods can be used in diagnosis of halitosis with high accuracy[38].

Although these four test methods are helpful in monitoring gases that lead to OM, the organoleptic method still is the most commonly used test.

Treatment of Oral Malodor

Chronic OM is a multi-factorial problem that requires a welldefined approach to diagnosis and treatment [39]. Successful treatment begins with identifying both major and minor contributing factors. Ameliorated periodontal health and OM treatment can produce significantly improved clinical outcomes. The ultimate goal of treatment for OM is achieved by eliminating, or at least reducing, the causative microorganisms and associated substrates by an improvement in home-based oral hygiene procedures.

Although it is reported that dental prosthesis, uncontrolled periodontal disease, and other oral infections contribute to orally-generated OM [40], the ADA Council [37] recommended assessment of all oral diseases and conditions that may contribute to OM.

Because OM mostly is the result of an overgrowth of oral microorganisms, treatment should be aimed at reducing the number of such micro-organisms that produce offensive volatile sulfide compounds by [39].

– Oral hygiene instruction meant to reinforce brushing, flossing, tongue scraping, and cleaning of the removable dental appliances

– Professional tooth cleaning including thorough scaling and root planning

– Use of antiseptic mouthwash

– Evaluation and proper maintenance to maintain oral/periodontal health.

Either mechanical or chemical procedures can be used intreatment. Oral hygiene procedures, such as tongue cleaning, are used for the mechanical reduction of micro-organisms [37]. In addition to tooth brushing and flossing, many studies reported the value of tongue cleaning procedures using a toothbrush or by scraping [40]. Chemical control of chronic OM is accomplished by antibacterial mouth washes and toothpastes recommended by a dentist as adjuncts to scaling and root planning [41].

After treatment, patients are instructed to follow a simple and inexpensive method at home to assess OM by using an odorfree plastic bag as an organoleptic self-assessment and as a cognitive behavioral treatment option for two-to-four weeks [42].

When physiologic OM originates from the dorso-posterior region of the tongue, instruction should be given on how to  appropriately clean the tongue surface [43]. For excessive dryness of the mouth at night, patients are encouraged to drink ample amounts of water in the morning [42]. Physiologic OM, a transient problem, more easily can be controlled or influenced through education focused on the patient’s oral hygiene behavior. The individual’s eating habits should be checked to determine the association between a high protein diet or certain dietary features and oral malodor. A low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet is associated with oral malodor [31].

People with halitophobia often avoid social situations and are continually preoccupied with concealing the perceived odor by frequent brushing, continuous gum chewing and candy sucking keeping a safe distance or talking “talking sideways”. Halitophobia is considered when no clinical findings support the patient’s complaint that halitosis exists. In some instances, referring individuals to a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist should be considered [44]. Some patients, however, resist seeing a psychological specialist even when they acknowledge or understand that their problem is not explicitly dental in origin [29].

Mouthwash suggested for the treatment of OM usually reduces bacterial load or associated odoriferous compounds [45], e.g., chlorhexidine gluconate, triclosan, essential oils, zinc chloride, zinc acetate, and others. Chlorhexidine mouth wash was considered very effective in reducing oral malodor especially if it is combined with zinc (0.3%) or with benzydamine hydrochloride because of the synergistic effect of those two components [46,47]. Also it is reported that tooth paste containing triclosan provides fresh breath for up to 12 hours after brushing; and is accepted by the American Dental Association [48,49]. Chewing xylitol gum positively affects self-rated and objective oral health status by controlling oral hygiene under conditions that interfere with oral hygiene maintenance and that reflected on OM [50] ( T. Hashiba et al. 2015). Farrell et al [51] recommended that combining therapeutic dentifrice, mouth rinse and tooth brushing are efficient means of oral malodor reduction. Recently Aung and his colleagues 2015 [52] performed a study to compare different oral hygiene procedures on reduction of VSCs in subjects with OM and divided the volunteers into two groups. Both groups performed tooth brushing, mouth washing with chlorine dioxide, tongue cleaning and combination of those in different sequence for five weeks. Total VSCs of subjects were measured with Breathtron and oral health status was also examined. Significant reduction in VSCs were shown by adding mouthwash or tongue cleaning to tooth brushing from the second week to fourth week. The greatest reduction in VSCs was found at the fifth week after the practice of all three oral hygiene regimens. A novel option for treatment of oral malodor in adolescent is using photodynamic therapy, either with or without tongue scraper. An immediate effect with greatest reduction in volatile sulfur compounds when tongue scraper combined with photodynamic therapy [54].

Breathe-freshening, however, is considered cosmetic rather than medical-management of chronic OM. Pervasive media advertising and the accessibility of mouth-freshening products are the primary reason people use over-the-counter products for OM. Some products genuinely may be effective in reducing number of bacteria, whereas others simply may mask the problem. A patient’s difficulty in discussing this problem, even with oral health providers, often is another motivating factor for the use of mouth-freshening products. As a part of oral hygiene regimen, the importance of mechanical tongue cleaning is emphasized because it reduces 52-75% of volatile sulfide compound (VSC) concentrations in the mouth air of periodontaly-healthy individuals [55,56]. Also health education incorporating prevention of oral malodor as a motivation tool  for oral health promotion could be valuable procedure to be included in high school dental health education [57].

Conclusion

Although there is no one solution related to the varying causes and implications of OM, practitioners can aim to reduce complications associated with OM through heightened awareness of the psychological and medical treatments such as breath clinics. Ultimately, dentists offer the best ability to assist patients in managing problems associated with OM by offering guidance on oral hygiene and opening the door to medical treatment if a non-oral cause is present. The patient should fully realize that the diagnosis of the cause of OM is essential for successful outcome of the treatment.

References
  1. Quirynen M, Teughels W, van Steenberghe D. Impact of an antiseptics on one-stage full- mouth disinfection. J Clin Periodontol. 2006, 33(1): 49-52.
  2. Eldarrate AH. Influence of oral health and life style on oral malodor. Int Dent J. 2011, 61(1): 47-51.
  3. Tonzetich J. Direct gas chromatographic analysis of sulphur compounds in mouth air in man. Arch of Oral Biol.1971, 16(6): 587-597.
  4. Ratcliff PA, Johnson PW. The relation between oral malodor, gingivitis and periodontitis. A review. J Periodontol. 1999, 70(5): 485-489.
  5. Rosenberg M, Leib E. Experience of an Israeli malodor clinic. In Rosenberg M, editor. Bad breath: research perspectives. Ramot Publishing- Tel Aviv University, 1997: 137-148
  6. Yaegaki K, Sanada K. Biochemical and clinical factors influencing oral malodor in periodontal patients. J Periodontol. 1992, 63(9): 783-789.
  7. Loesche W. The effects of antimicrobial mouth rinses on oral malodor and their status relative to US Food and Drug Administration regulations. Quintessence Int. 1999, 30(5): 311-318.
  8. Rayman S, Almas K. Halitosis among racially diverse population: an update. Inter Dent Hyg. 2008, 6(1): 2-7.
  9. Newman M. G. The role of periodontitis in oral malodor: Clinical perception in bad breath 1996; a multidisciplinary approach. Eds. van Steenberg D. and Rosenberg M, Editors. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 3-14-1996.
  10. Miyazaki H, Sakao S, Katoh Y, Takehara T. Correlation between volatile sulphur compounds and certain oral health measurements in the general population. J Periodontol. 1995, 66(8): 679-684.
  11. Frexinos J, Denis P, Allemand H, Allouche S, Los F et al. Descriptive study of digestive functional symptoms in the French general population. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1998, 22(10): 785-791.
  12. van Steenbergh D, Rosenberg M. Bad Breath: A multidisciplinary approach. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1996.
  13. Almas K, Al-Hawish A, Al-Khamis W. Oral hygiene practices, smoking habits and self- perceived oral malodor among dental students. J Contemp Dent Pract 2003,15(4): 77-90.
  14. Arowojulo MO, Dosumu EB. Halitosis (Fetor oris) in patients seen at the periodontology clinic of the University College Hospital, Ibadan- a subjective evaluation. Niger Post grad Med J. 2004, 11(3): 221-224.
  15. Levin L, Rosenberg M. Oral hygiene. Caries status and bad breath among young Israeli recruits. Rfual Hapeh Vchasinayim. 2005, 22(1): 27-31.
  16. Al- Aansari JM, Boodai H, Al-Sumait N, Al-Khabbaz AK et al. Factors associated with self- reported halitosis in Kuwaiti patients. J Dent. 2006, 34(7): 444-449.
  17. Söder B, Johansson B, Söder PO. The relation between foetor ex ore, oral hygiene and periodontal disease. Swed Dent J. 2000, 24: 73-82.
  18. Evirgen S, Kamburoğlu K, Gulsahi A. Effect of clinician experience, age gender and calibration on the assessment of halitosis. Oral Health Prev. Dent. 2013, 11(1): 17-22.
  19. Liu XN, Shinada K, Chen XC, Zhang BX, Yaegaki K et al. Oral Malodor – related parameters in the Chinese general population. J Clin Periodontol. 2006, 33 (1): 29-30.
  20. Rosenberg M, Kulkarni GV, Bosy A, McCulloch CA. Reproducibility and sensitivity of oral malodor measurements with a portable sulfide monitor. J Dent Res. 1991, 70(111):1436-1440.
  21. Iwakura M, Yasuno Y, Shimura M, Sakamoto S. Clinical characteristics of halitosis: differences in two patients groups with primary and secondary complaints of halitosis. J Dent Res. 1994, 73(a): 1568-1564.
  22. Kawamoto A, Sugano N, Motohashi M, Matsumoto S, Ito K. Oral malodor and the menstrual cycle. J Periodontal Res. 2010, 45(5) 681-687.
  23. ADA Council on scientific affairs. Oral malodor. J Am Dent. 2003, 134(2): 209-214.
  24. De Boever EH, Loesche WJ.. Assessing the contribution of anaerobic microflora of the tongue of oral malodor. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995, 126(10): 1384-1393.
  25. Haraszthy VI, Sreenivasan PK, Zambon JJ. Community- level assessment of dental plaque bacteria susceptibility to triclosan over 19 years. BMC Oral Health. 2014, 14:61.
  26. Ueno M, Takeuchi S, Takehara S, Kawaguchi Y. Saliva viscosity as potential risk factor for oral malodor. Acta. Odontol Scand. 2014; 72(8): 1005-1009.
  27. Lee E, Lee YH, Kim W, Kho HS. Self- reported prevalence and severity of xerostomia and its related conditions in individuals attending hospital for general health examination. In J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014, 43(4): 499-505.
  28. Delanghe G, Ghyselen J, Bollen C, van Steenberghe D, Vandekerckhove BN et al. An inventory of patients’ response to treatment at a multidisciplinary breath odor clinic. Quintessence Int. 1999, 30(5): 307-310.
  29. Murata T, Yamaga T, Iida T, Miyazaki H, Yaegaki K.Classification and examination of halitosis. Inter Dent J. 2002, 52(Suppl 3): 181-188.
  30. Loesche WJ, Kazor C. Microbiology and treatment of halitosis. Periodontol 2000. 2002, 28: 256-279.
  31. Shimura M, Yasuno Y, Iwakura M, Shimada Y, Sakai S et al. A new monitor with a zinc-oxide thin film semiconductor sensor for the measurement of volatile sulfur compounds in mouth air. J Periodontol. 1996, 67(4): 396-402.
  32. Sanz M, Roldán S, Herrera D. Fundamentals of breath malodor. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2001, 2(4): 1-17.
  33. Rosenberg M, Septon I, Eli I, Bar-Ness R, Gelernter I et al. Halitosis measured by an industrial sulphide monitor. J Periodontol. 1991, 62(8): 487-489.
  34. Morita M, Wang HL. Association between oral malodor and adult periodontitis: A review. J Clin Periodontol. 2001, 1(20): 813-819.
  35. Iwakura M, Hario H, Washio J. Oral malodor measurement monitor (Breathron). The Nippon Dental Review. 2002, 62:105-108.
  36. Iwakura M, Hario H, Washio J. Development of oral malodor assessment for clinical practice. J Dent Health. 2002, 52: 456-457.
  37. Vasilakis GJ, Preis CO, Glaz J, Bissada NF. Effects of daily mechanical tongue cleaning of the rat on dental plaque and tongue mucosa. Clin Prev Dent. 1981, 3(5): 7-10.
  38. Petrini M, Costacurta M, Ferrante M, Trentini P, Docimo R et al. Association between the organoleptic scores, oral condition and β-galactosidase in children affected by halitosis. Int J Dent Hyg. 2014, 12(3): 213-218.
  39. Tonzetich J. A production and origin of oral malodor. a review of mechanisms and methods of analysis. J Periodontol. 1977, 48(1):13-20.
  40. Richter JL. Diagnosis and treatment of halitosis. Compend Cont Educ Dent. 1996, 17(4): 370-372.
  41. Lee PP, Mak WY, Newsome P. The aetiology and treatment of oral halitosis, an update. Hong Kong Med J. 2004, 10(6): 414-418.
  42. Quirymen M, Zhao H, van Steenberghe D. Review of the treatment strategies for malodor. Clin Oral Invest. 2002, 6(1):1-10.
  43. Suhas S, Sudarshan S, Pai KM. “Air bag” organoleptic behavioral experiment for managing fear of oral malodor. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2004, 35(1):13-25.
  44. Roldán S, Herrera D, O’Connor A, González I, Sanz M. A combined therapeutic approach to manage oral halitosis: a 3-man prospective case series. J Periodontol. 2005, 76(6):1025-1033.
  45. Yaegeki K, Coil JM. Examination, classification, and treatment of halitosis; clinical perspectives. J Can Dent Assoc. 2000, 66(5): 257-261.
  46. Scully C, Porter S. Orofacial disease: update for the dental clinical team: 10. Halitosis and disturbances of taste, orofacial movement or sensation. Dent Update. 1999, 26(10): 464-468.
  47. Thrane PS, Young A, Jonski G, Rölla G. A new mouth rinse combining zinc and chlorhexidine in low concentration provides superior efficacy against halitosis compared to existing formulation: a double blind clinical study. J Clin Dent. 2007, 18(3): 82-86.
  48. Sharma NC, Galustian HJ, Qaquish J, Galustians A, Rustogi KN et al. The clinical effectiveness of a dentifrice containing triclosan and a copolymer for controlling breath odor measured organoleptically twelve hours after tooth-brushing. J Clin Dent. 1999, 10(4): 131-134.
  49. Niles HP, Vazquez J, Rustogi KN, Williams M, Gaffar A et al. The clinical effectiveness of a dentifrice containing triclosan and a copolymer for providing long-term control of breath odor measured chromatographically. J Clin Dent. 1999, 10(4): 135-138.
  50. Hashiba T, Takeuchi K, Shimazaki Y, Takeshita T, Yamashita Y. Chewing xylitol gum improves self-rated and objective indicators of oral health status under conditions interrupting regular oral hygiene. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2015, 235(1): 39-46.
  51. Farrell S, Barker M, Walanski A , Gerlach RW. Short -term effects of a combination product night-time therapeutic regimen on breath malodor. J of Contemp Dent Pract. 2008, 9(6): 1-8.
  52. Aung EE, Ueno M, Zaitsu T, Furukawa S, Kawaguchi Y. Effectiveness of three oral hygiene regimens on oral malodor reduction: a randomized clinical trial. 2015: 16: 31.
  53. Lopes RG, da Mota AC, Soares C, Tarzia O, Deana AM et al. Immediate results of photodynamic therapy for the treatment of halitosis in adolescent; randomized, controlled clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2016, 31(1): 41-47.
  54. Yaegaki K, Sanada K. Effects of a two-phase oil-water mouth wash on halitosis. Clin Prev Dent. 1992, 14(1): 5-9.
  55. Loesche WJ, Bretz WA, Kerschensteiner D, Stoll J, Scocransky, SS et al. Development of a diagnostic test for anaerobic periodontal infections base on plaque hydrolysis of benzoyl- Dl- arginine naphthylamide. J Clin Micro 1990, 28(7): 1551-1559.
  56. Yokoyama S, Ohnuki M, Shinada K, Ueno M, Wright FA et al. Oral malodor and related factors in Japanese senior high school students. J Sch Health. 2010, 80(7): 346-352.

Be the first to comment on "Oral Malodor as a Health and Social Problem"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*